Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2017-02-21 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 295 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M01, getting a overall score of 77 against 74.7. The HTC U Ultra construction is extremely thinner than Samsung Galaxy M01, although it's just a bit heavier and was released many years before. The Samsung Galaxy M01 features a bit faster processor than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with 4 more cpu cores.
HTC U Ultra has a sharper display than Galaxy M01, and although they both have a display of the same size, the HTC U Ultra also has a way better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a lot better number of pixels per inch in the display. HTC U Ultra features a superior memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy M01 counts with longer battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. HTC U Ultra captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy M01, because although it has a lower 12 MP resolution back camera, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.