Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-06-02 | 2018-03-09 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has an overall score of 82.5, which is better than the Galaxy M01's 74.7 overall score. LG V30S ThinQ's body is just a little bit lighter and thinner than Galaxy M01, despite of the fact that it was released 2 years before. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V30S ThinQ has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version and Galaxy M01 has Android 11 version, giving you a couple additional features and performance improvements.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a bit better performance than Galaxy M01, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has more RAM. LG V30S ThinQ features a more vivid display than Galaxy M01, because it has a little bit bigger display, a way greater count of pixels per inch of screen and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Galaxy M01, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage. The LG V30S ThinQ features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has a larger sensor taking higher quality videos and photographs, a much larger aperture for better low-light captures, a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a more megapixels back camera.
Galaxy M01 has better battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 21% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.