Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is just a bit better than Galaxy M01, with a global score of 81.3 against 74.7. The LG V35 ThinQ is an older device than Galaxy M01, but LG was able to make it a bit lighter and extremely thinner. The LG V35 ThinQ features a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has a bit bigger screen, way more pixels per inch of screen and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit superior processor than Galaxy M01, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better camera than Galaxy M01, because it has a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution, a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality, a much bigger aperture and a more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
LG V35 ThinQ has a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage. The Galaxy M01 features superior battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.