Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge has a global score of 89.6, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy M01's 74.7 global score. Both phones we compare here include Android operating system, but the Motorola edge has an older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy M01 has Android 11. The Motorola edge body is somewhat heavier but just a bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy M01, and they were only released 1 months apart.
Motorola edge features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy M01, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola edge also has 3 GB more RAM memory. Motorola edge has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy M01, because it has a much higher 1080 x 2340 resolution, a larger screen and a greater pixels amount in each display inch.
Motorola edge captures greater photographs and videos than Galaxy M01, because it has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a larger aperture to capture better captures and video in poorly lited situations and a back camera with way more megapixels.
The Motorola edge features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy M01, because it has 256 GB internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Motorola edge has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has a 13% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.