Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion is just a bit better than Galaxy M01, having a 78.5 score against 74.7. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion construction has the same weight than Galaxy M01, but it is a lot thinner. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a more recent 12 version and Galaxy M01 has Android 11, so it offers some nice extra features and performance optimizations.
Galaxy M01 features a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a lot better looking screen than Galaxy M01, because it has a little bigger screen, a higher pixels count per inch in the screen and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has slightly more memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M01, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy M01, because it has a way more MP back-facing camera, a larger aperture, a way bigger camera sensor and a much better video definition.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.