Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a score of 87.1, which is better than the Galaxy M01's general score of 74.7. Even though the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is somewhat heavier than the Galaxy M01, it's somewhat thinner and noticeably newer. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a newer 14 version while Galaxy M01 has Android 11, giving some extra features and performance optimizations.
Galaxy M01 counts with a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better display than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bigger display and a higher count of pixels per screen inch.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has a way bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos and videos, a way better (4K) video definition, a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much higher resolution back camera.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a way bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy M01, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy M01, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.