Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 295 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G200 5G is better than the Samsung Galaxy M01, with an 86.2 score against 74.7. These phones use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both of them should provide the user identical OS features. Motorola Moto G200 5G's body is newer and thinner, but somewhat heavier than the Samsung Galaxy M01.
Moto G200 5G has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy M01, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Moto G200 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. The Moto G200 5G counts with a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2460, a greater pixels density and a bigger display.
The Moto G200 5G captures greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has a bigger aperture, a back facing camera with a much higher resolution and a lot better (4K) video resolution. Motorola Moto G200 5G has a slightly bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M01, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Moto G200 5G features improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.