Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-05-15 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Blue and Brown |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 295 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision has a global score of 80.7, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M01's global score of 74.7. Motorola One Vision is an older and just a little heavier phone than Samsung Galaxy M01, but Motorola was able to make it somewhat thinner anyway. Motorola One Vision has a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has a much better resolution of 1080 x 2520px, a greater number of pixels per inch of screen and a quite bigger screen.
The Motorola One Vision has a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M01, and although they both have a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Motorola One Vision also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola One Vision features a little bit better processing power than Galaxy M01, and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola One Vision also has more RAM memory.
Motorola One Vision takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy M01, because it has a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels, a way larger aperture to take better photos in poorly lited situations, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photographs and a way better (4K) video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy M01 has a little better battery lifetime than Motorola One Vision, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.