Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is much better than the Samsung Galaxy M01, having a general score of 87 against 74.7. Although Motorola razr (2020) and Samsung Galaxy M01 were released with only a couple months difference, Motorola razr (2020)'s body is way thinner but somewhat heavier than Samsung Galaxy M01. These devices work with the same Android 11 operating system, so both should provide the user identical operating system features.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy M01, and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 5 GB more RAM. The Motorola razr (2020) features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has a higher resolution of 876 x 2142px, a greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a bit larger screen.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 video definition, a way bigger aperture to take better photography and video in low-light environments, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a way more MP camera in the back.
Motorola razr (2020) has a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M01, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy M01 has a much longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 43% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.