Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 15 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | -- |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | -- |
| LCD | LTPO |
| 295 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is just a bit better than Galaxy M01, with a 79.2 score against 74.7. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has the newer 15 version and Galaxy M01 has Android 11, so it provides you some extra features and a performance increase. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s design is notably newer and way thinner, but heavier than the Galaxy M01.
The Samsung Galaxy M01 features a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little bit smaller display. Galaxy M01 has a much better performing CPU than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a much better storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy M01, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a lot higher 50 MP resolution camera and a bigger camera aperture.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has superior battery performance than Galaxy M01, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.