Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-11-12 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Meteor grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | LCD |
| 295 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 8 V 5G UW is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy M01, getting an 80.3 score against 74.7. Although the Nokia 8 V 5G UW and the Samsung Galaxy M01 were released with only a couple months difference, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW design is noticeably heavier but also somewhat thinner than the Samsung Galaxy M01. Both phones in this review work with Android operating system, but Nokia 8 V 5G UW has an older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy M01 has Android 11.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy M01, because it has a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bigger display and a better display density. Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy M01, because it has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB internal storage.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy M01, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW takes way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photos, a way more mega pixels camera, a bigger camera aperture and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.