Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-09-02 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Sonic silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a global score of 76.2, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M01's 74.7 general score. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but nubia Red Magic 5S has the older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy M01 has Android 11 version. The nubia Red Magic 5S design is notably heavier but a bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy M01, and both of them were released only 3 months apart.
The nubia Red Magic 5S features a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has a way higher 1080 x 2340px resolution, a bigger display and a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. Nubia Red Magic 5S has a little bit better performance than Galaxy M01, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a larger amount of RAM.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a much better camera than Galaxy M01, because it has a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a larger aperture, a way higher video resolution and a back-facing camera with way more megapixels. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a little bit better memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M01, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy M01, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.