Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is much better than Galaxy M01's 74.7 global score. Although Galaxy A50 is older than Galaxy M01, it's construction is just a little bit lighter and thinner. The Galaxy A50 features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy M01, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A50 also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A50 features a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has more pixels per inch of display, a little larger screen and a much better 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy M01, and although they both have an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has 128 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy M01, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Galaxy A50 also has a much bigger aperture, a bigger sensor taking higher quality videos and photos and a lot better resolution camera in the back.
The Galaxy A50 has a battery performance that's just as good as Samsung Galaxy M01's battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.