Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-12-27 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is better than the Galaxy M01, having an 85.5 score against 74.7. These devices have the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any difference in that aspect. Even though Samsung Galaxy A51 and the Galaxy M01 were released only 5 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy A51 body is a little heavier but incredibly thinner than the Galaxy M01.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a greater pixels number per inch of screen and a bit larger screen. The Galaxy A51 features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy M01, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A51 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M01, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy A51's battery lifetime is just as good as Samsung Galaxy M01's battery performance.
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a way better camera than Galaxy M01, because it has a larger aperture to take better low-light photos and videos, a way higher 3840x2160 video quality, a much larger camera sensor and a much more megapixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.