Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-04-29 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Prism cube black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a score of 90.8, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy M01's 74.7 score. Both phones we are comparing here include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). Although Samsung Galaxy A51 5G and the Samsung Galaxy M01 were only released with a couple of months difference, Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's body is heavier but thinner than the Samsung Galaxy M01.
The Galaxy A51 5G features a little better performance than Galaxy M01, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A51 5G also has more RAM. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy M01, because it has a little bigger screen, a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and more pixels per inch of screen.
The Galaxy A51 5G features a much greater storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has a 13% more battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G takes way better photographs and videos than Galaxy M01, because it has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a way better resolution camera in the back, a bigger camera aperture to take better captures in low-light situations and a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.