Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a global score of 76.9, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy M01's overall score of 74.7. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A70 has the older 10 version while Galaxy M01 has Android 11. The Samsung Galaxy A70 design is notably thinner than the Galaxy M01, although it is a little bit heavier and was released around 13 months before.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 has just a bit better performance than Galaxy M01, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy M01, because it has more pixels per inch of display, a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy M01 captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier sensor which gives a lower photo and video quality and a way smaller aperture, they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates. Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy M01, and although they both have a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has 128 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy A70 has a bit better battery duration than Galaxy M01, because it has a 13% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.