Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is much better than Samsung Galaxy M01, having a 97.6 score against 74.7. The Samsung Galaxy Fold construction is a lot heavier but noticeably thinner than the Samsung Galaxy M01, and they were only released 8 months apart. Both phones we compare here have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Samsung Galaxy M01 has Android 11 version.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features a bit better processing power than Galaxy M01, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has 9 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Fold features just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen, a way higher resolution of 1536 x 2152 and a larger screen.
Galaxy Fold features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy M01, because although it has a lower resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a way bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photos, a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution and a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy Fold features much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M01, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy Fold counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy M01, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.