Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 295 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a lot better than Galaxy M01, having a 90.8 score against 74.7. Samsung Galaxy Note 20's design is somewhat thinner but heavier than Galaxy M01, and both of them were released with only a few months difference. Galaxy Note 20 features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy M01, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy M01, because it has a much higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, more pixels per inch in the screen and a larger display. The Galaxy Note 20 features a superior camera than Galaxy M01, because although it has a camera with less megapixels, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures and video, a much higher video quality and a way bigger sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a slightly better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M01, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy Note 20 features just a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.