Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2015-08-13 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 5 is slightly better than the Galaxy M01, getting a 79.3 score against 74.7. Galaxy Note 5 is a older and just a little bit heavier phone than Galaxy M01, but Samsung was able to make it much thinner anyway. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 5 has an older 5.1 version and Galaxy M01 has Android 11.
Galaxy Note 5 counts with a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy M01, and although they both have a same size display, the Galaxy Note 5 also has a lot higher pixels density and a lot higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. Galaxy M01 features much more storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Galaxy M01 features a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores (although they are slower). Galaxy Note 5 shoots better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has a bigger aperture, a back camera with more mega-pixels, a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Galaxy M01 has superior battery duration than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.