Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2015-08-21 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note5 has a global score of 80.2, which is a little bit better than Galaxy M01's 74.7 overall score. The Galaxy Note5 is a way older and a bit heavier phone than Galaxy M01, but Samsung managed to make it noticeably thinner anyway. Galaxy Note5 has a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy M01, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note5 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Note5 features a much better looking display than Galaxy M01, and although they both have a same size screen, the Galaxy Note5 also has a lot more pixels per inch of display and a much higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. Galaxy M01 has a much better memory for games and applications than Galaxy Note5, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy M01 features greater battery performance than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. Galaxy Note5 captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has a larger sensor providing a better image quality, a bigger aperture, a back camera with a better 16 megapixels resolution and a way higher (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.