Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-05-16 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G has a general score of 93.6, which is way better than Samsung Galaxy M01's 74.7 overall score. The Galaxy S10 5G body is incredibly thinner than Samsung Galaxy M01, but it's somewhat heavier and was released around 13 months before. These phones use the same Android 11 operating system, so both of them should count with identical OS features.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy M01, because it has a larger display, a way better 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution and a much higher display pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M01, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M01, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy M01, because although it has a camera in the back with lesser mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a much better (4K) video quality, a bigger camera sensor taking higher quality photographs and a lot larger aperture for better low light captures.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.