Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than Samsung Galaxy M01, getting a 98 score against 74.7. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body is notably heavier but somewhat thinner than the Samsung Galaxy M01, and both of them were only released 3 months apart. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has newer 13 version while Samsung Galaxy M01 has Android 11.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy M01, because it has a much better display pixels density, a larger display and a much better resolution of 1440 x 3200. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M01, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a greater camera than Galaxy M01, because it has a bigger camera aperture to capture better photos and videos in low light environments, a much higher 108 megapixels resolution back camera, a way higher video resolution and a much bigger sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.