Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is way better than Galaxy M01's overall score of 74.7. The Galaxy S22 Ultra body is newer and somewhat thinner than the Galaxy M01's, although it is also incredibly heavier. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version and Galaxy M01 has Android 11 version.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy M01, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better display than Galaxy M01, because it has a way better 1440 x 3088 resolution, a lot greater pixel count per screen inch and a bigger screen.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit more storage for applications and games than Galaxy M01, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Galaxy S22 Ultra takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy M01, because it has a larger camera aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited situations, a much bigger back camera sensor taking much better quality photographs and videos, a much better video quality and a lot more megapixels camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with greater battery life than Galaxy M01, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.