Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-02 | -- |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | -- |
| 5.93 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue and Red | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is way better than the Galaxy M01, having a score of 90.7 against 74.7. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra design is a lot thinner and extremely lighter than the Galaxy M01. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has the newer 14 version while Galaxy M01 has Android 11.
Galaxy M01 features a much better performing processing unit than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way better screen than Galaxy M01, because it has a larger display, a much higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a much better pixel number per inch of display.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much greater memory for applications and games than Galaxy M01, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Galaxy S25 Ultra features a very superior camera than Galaxy M01, because it has a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a way bigger diafragm aperture to take better images and videos in low-light situations and a much bigger sensor shooting much higher quality photos.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.