Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2017-08-11 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 Active is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy M01, getting an 81.9 score against 74.7. The Galaxy S8 Active body has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy M01, but it is somewhat heavier. Galaxy S8 Active features a little bit better performance than Galaxy M01, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S8 Active also has 1 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy S8 Active features a much more vibrant display than Galaxy M01, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2960px, a lot better pixels density and a quite larger display. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy M01, because although it has a back facing camera with a worse 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a larger sensor which provides a better image and video quality, a way better video quality and a lot bigger aperture for better captures in low-light situations.
Galaxy S8 Active has slightly more memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M01, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 32 GB more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy S8 Active and Galaxy M01 feature extremely similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.