Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | -- |
| 295 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy M01's 74.7 score. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS, but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has newer 8.0 Oreo version while Samsung Galaxy M01 has Android 11. Even though Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device than Samsung Galaxy M01, it must be told that it's also extremely heavier and extremely thicker.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy M01, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a way better looking screen than Galaxy M01, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with much more pixels per screen inch and a lot higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Galaxy M01 takes a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way tinier aperture which is not good for low-light images and a smaller back-facing camera sensor which offers a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy M01 also counts with a back facing camera with a higher 13 mega pixels resolution.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy M01, and although they both have an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has 32 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy M01, because it has a 13% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.