Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 295 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a general score of 81, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M01's 74.7 global score. Galaxy XCover Pro is a notably heavier device than Samsung Galaxy M01, but both have the same thickness. Both phones in our current comparison have the same Android 11 operating system, so they should offer the same operating system features.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy M01, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340, a bit bigger screen and a better pixels count per inch in the display.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy M01, and although they both have an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro takes clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy M01, because although it has a way smaller back camera sensor taking lot lower quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a much bigger camera aperture to capture better low light captures and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy M01, because it has a 1% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.