Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is better than Samsung Galaxy M01, with a global score of 88.5 against 74.7. Both devices in our current comparison include Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version and Samsung Galaxy M01 has Android 11. Even though Galaxy Z Flip and Samsung Galaxy M01 were only released with a couple months difference, the Galaxy Z Flip design is notably thinner but just a little bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy M01.
Galaxy Z Flip has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy M01, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has 5 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has a bigger display, a greater pixels amount in each display inch and a much higher 1080 x 2636 resolution.
The Galaxy Z Flip has much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M01, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy M01 counts with improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a better camera than Galaxy M01, because although it has a back facing camera with a worse 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a much higher video resolution, a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.