Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than Samsung Galaxy M01, with a 92.3 score against 74.7. Although the Galaxy Z Flip 5G and Samsung Galaxy M01 were only released with a couple months difference, Galaxy Z Flip 5G's construction is just a little bit heavier but also much thinner. Both of these devices include the same Android 11 operating system, so both of them should give you identical operating system features.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy M01, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has a larger screen, a higher pixels density and a lot better 1080 x 2636 resolution.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy M01, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy M01 features better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 21% greater battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G shoots much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M01, because although it has a back camera with a lower 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a much higher video quality, a bigger aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light situations and a bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.