Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than the Galaxy M01, getting a 94.6 score against 74.7. Both devices in this review include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both of them should give you all the same OS features. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 and the Galaxy M01 were only released 4 months apart, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is a lot thinner but also much heavier than the Galaxy M01.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy M01, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1768 x 2208, a greater pixel count in each display inch and a way larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy M01, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much better camera than Galaxy M01, because although it has a back-facing camera with less MP, it also counts with a lot higher video quality, a larger diafragm aperture and a much larger sensor.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little longer battery duration than Galaxy M01, because it has a 13% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.