Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-02 | 2017-06-01 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Pink, Red and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 295 pixels per inch | 801 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 10.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia XZ Premium has a global score of 79.8, which is a bit better than the Galaxy M01's 74.7 overall score. Although the Sony Xperia XZ Premium is notably older and somewhat heavier than Galaxy M01, it's construction is still much thinner. The Xperia XZ Premium has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy M01, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xperia XZ Premium also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Xperia XZ Premium has a much better looking screen than Galaxy M01, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way better 2160 x 3840 resolution and a way better display pixel density. The Sony Xperia XZ Premium counts with a little bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M01, because although it has a SD card slot that supports up to 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy M01 has greater battery life than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3230mAh. Sony Xperia XZ Premium captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy M01, because it has a much larger sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs, a lot more mega pixels back facing camera, a larger camera aperture for better low light captures and videos and a much better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.