Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-06-17 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T has a global score of 82.2, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy M01's 74.7 global score. The Xiaomi Mi 9T design is thinner than Samsung Galaxy M01, but it is heavier and was released just 12 months before. These devices have Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Mi 9T has an older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy M01 has Android 11 version.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M01, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also has 3 GB more RAM. Xiaomi Mi 9T features a brighter display than Galaxy M01, because it has a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution, a greater pixels number per display inch and a quite bigger screen.
Xiaomi Mi 9T takes a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy M01, because it has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photos and video, a back camera with lot more mega-pixels, a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a much larger back-facing camera sensor. The Xiaomi Mi 9T features just a bit more memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M01, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T's battery life is very similar to Samsung Galaxy M01's battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.