Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-02 | 2019-08-20 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a general score of 82.7, which is better than the Galaxy M01's general score of 74.7. Despite of the fact the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is older and somewhat heavier than Galaxy M01, it's body is still somewhat thinner. Both phones we compare here have Android operating system, but Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has 10 version while Galaxy M01 has Android 11 version.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with just a little better performance than Galaxy M01, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a sharper screen than Galaxy M01, because it has a greater display density, a much higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little bit larger screen.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy M01, because it has a bigger aperture, a camera with much more mega pixels, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a lot better video resolution. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has slightly more storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M01, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro and Galaxy M01 both have similar batteries duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.