Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-05-12 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an overall score of 87.9, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy M01's global score of 74.7. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy M01 has Android 11. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's construction is extremely heavier but thinner than the Samsung Galaxy M01, and both of them were released with only 1 months difference.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy M01, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a better screen than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has a lot better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a higher count of pixels per display inch and a larger screen.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has just a bit bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy M01, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has a 4700mAh battery size. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro captures a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy M01, because it has a much more mega-pixels camera, a way higher 7680x4320 video definition, a larger diafragm aperture and a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.