Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-05-20 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 295 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is just a bit better than the Galaxy M01, getting a global score of 76.6 against 74.7. Although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 and the Galaxy M01 were released only 0 months apart, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's design is heavier but thinner than the Galaxy M01. Both devices we are comparing use Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has 10 version while Galaxy M01 has Android 11 version.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M01. They have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy M01, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340, a quite bigger display and a better pixel amount per inch in the screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features just a bit more storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M01, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 128 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy M01, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way higher image quality, a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light captures and videos and a lot more mega pixels back camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has improved battery life than Galaxy M01, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.