Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-06-02 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 295 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a global score of 81.1, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M01's global score of 74.7. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy M01 has Android 11 version. Even though the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro and Samsung Galaxy M01 were released only a couple of months apart, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's design is thinner but somewhat heavier than Samsung Galaxy M01.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a little bit better performance than Galaxy M01, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has 3 GB more RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy M01, because it has a larger screen, a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and more pixels per inch of display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy M01, and although they both have an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has better battery life than Galaxy M01, because it has a 26% larger battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy M01, because it has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a much bigger sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality, a way better 64 mega pixels resolution camera and a bigger aperture for better low-light images and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.