Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2019-02-05 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.66 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro is much better than the Galaxy M10, with a general score of 92.8 against 73.5. Apple iPhone 12 Pro works with iOS 15.x OS, and Galaxy M10 counts with Android 9.0 Pie OS. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro body is newer and just a bit thinner, but also somewhat heavier than Galaxy M10. Apple iPhone 12 Pro has a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy M10, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot more pixels per display inch and a lot better resolution of 1170 x 2532px.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro has a much more powerful processing unit than Galaxy M10, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and a 64-bit CPU. IPhone 12 Pro takes better videos and photos than Galaxy M10, because although it has a back-facing camera with less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light photos and videos and a lot better video definition.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro counts with a slightly better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy M10, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy M10 features greater battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, because it has a 3400mAh battery capacity against 2815mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.