Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | iOS 9.x |
| 2019-02-05 | 2015-09-09 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 575.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 750 x 1334 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 271 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Apple A9 APL0898 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time |
| 5.36 | 3.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 6s is much better than Samsung Galaxy M10, with an 83 score against 73.5. The iPhone 6s works with iOS 9.x OS, and Samsung Galaxy M10 has Android 9.0 Pie OS. The iPhone 6s body is lighter and a little bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy M10, even though it was released many years before.
IPhone 6s has a better performing processing unit than Galaxy M10, because although it has 6 less CPU cores (although they are faster) and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and a graphics co-processor. The iPhone 6s counts with a lot better looking display than Galaxy M10, because although it has a lot smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1334 x 750, it also counts with a quite greater quantity of pixels per inch of display.
IPhone 6s has a slightly bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy M10, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy M10 features a really longer battery lifetime than iPhone 6s, because it has a 3400mAh battery capacity.
The Apple iPhone 6s has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy M10, because although it has a camera in the back with a worse 12 MP resolution and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a bigger camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.