Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | iOS 9.x |
| 2019-02-05 | 2015-09-09 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.23 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 625.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 271 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Apple A9 APL1022 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 2750mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 384 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 5.36 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 6s Plus has a general score of 84.2, which is much better than Galaxy M10's overall score of 73.5. Although the iPhone 6s Plus is incredibly older and somewhat heavier than the Galaxy M10, it's body is still just a little bit thinner. The iPhone 6s Plus counts with iOS 9.x OS, while Galaxy M10 works with Android 9.0 Pie OS.
The Apple iPhone 6s Plus counts with a faster processor than Samsung Galaxy M10, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processor and an extra GPU. IPhone 6s Plus counts with a much better display than Galaxy M10, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a better 1920 x 1080 resolution.
IPhone 6s Plus counts with a bit more storage for applications and games than Galaxy M10, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage. IPhone 6s Plus takes slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy M10, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for shooting photos and videos in poorly lited situations and a lower resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a much better video quality and a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality photos.
Samsung Galaxy M10 counts with greater battery life than iPhone 6s Plus, because it has a 3400mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.