Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-02-05 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 271 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 Plus has a global score of 87.1, which is better than Galaxy M10's overall score of 73.5. The iPhone 8 Plus body has the same thickness than the Galaxy M10, but it is somewhat heavier. IPhone 8 Plus counts with a faster processing unit than Galaxy M10, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), and they both have a 3 GB RAM memory, the iPhone 8 Plus also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The Apple iPhone 8 Plus features a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy M10, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1080 x 1920 resolution and a greater screen pixels density. The Apple iPhone 8 Plus has a much better camera than Galaxy M10, because although it has a less MP back camera, it also counts with a larger sensor which gives a higher image and video quality, a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a larger diafragm aperture.
Apple iPhone 8 Plus has much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy M10, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy M10 features greater battery duration than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 26% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.