Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-02-05 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is better than Galaxy M10, having an 88.1 score against 73.5. IPhone X is a a little bit heavier device than Galaxy M10, but both of them are 0.3inches thick. The Apple iPhone X has a better CPU than Galaxy M10, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), and they both have 3 GB of RAM memory, the Apple iPhone X also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The Apple iPhone X counts with a much better screen than Galaxy M10, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way greater pixel count per inch of screen and a way better 1125 x 2436 resolution. The iPhone X features a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy M10, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy M10 counts with better battery life than iPhone X, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity against 2716mAh. The iPhone X captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy M10, because although it has a worse resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality, a larger aperture to take better images in low-light situations and a lot better 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.