Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-02-05 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 271 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR is much better than the Galaxy M10, getting an 82 score against 73.5. Despite being the best phone in this comparison review, the Apple iPhone XR construction is heavier and just a little bit thicker than Galaxy M10. IPhone XR counts with a better performing processing unit than Galaxy M10, because although it has 2 less cores (although faster), and they both have a 3 GB RAM memory, the iPhone XR also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
IPhone XR has a sharper screen than Galaxy M10, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 828 x 1792px and a just a bit higher screen pixels density. Samsung Galaxy M10 counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
IPhone XR counts with a much better camera than Galaxy M10, because although it has a worse resolution camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality. Samsung Galaxy M10 has a bit superior battery performance than iPhone XR, because it has a 3400mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.