Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-02-05 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is a bit better than the Galaxy M10, having a global score of 80 against 73.5. Google Pixel 3's body is a little bit thicker but just a little bit lighter than Galaxy M10, and both were only released with a few months difference. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy M10, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 3 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 3 has a sharper screen than Galaxy M10, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way greater count of pixels per display inch and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2160px. The Google Pixel 3 captures clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy M10, because although it has a worse 12.2 megapixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video definition, a larger camera aperture and a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy M10 features much more memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. Galaxy M10 has just a little better battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 17 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.