Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-02-05 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is slightly better than Galaxy M10, getting a global score of 80.7 against 73.5. Although it's the best cellphone we compare here, we must highlight that it is also a little thicker and heavier. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy M10, because it has a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels, a bit bigger screen and a way higher pixels count per inch in the display.
Galaxy M10 features a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy M10, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 3 XL captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy M10, because although it has a less mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a larger camera sensor taking better quality photos and a bigger aperture for better photos and videos in low light situations.
Google Pixel 3 XL features just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy M10, because it has a 3430mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.