Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-02-05 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is better than Samsung Galaxy M10, having an 81.9 score against 73.5. Even though the Google Pixel 4 and Samsung Galaxy M10 were released only 9 months apart, Google Pixel 4's body is just a little bit lighter but just a little bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy M10. Google Pixel 4 counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy M10, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way greater count of pixels per inch of display and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2280.
The Google Pixel 4 features a better processing power than Galaxy M10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has more RAM memory. Galaxy M10 counts with a much better memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Google Pixel 4 counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy M10, because although it has a camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photos, a bigger aperture and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy M10 features longer battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 3400mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.