Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-02-05 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is way better than the Galaxy M10, getting a general score of 89 against 73.5. The Google Pixel 5 design is newer and just a bit lighter than the Galaxy M10's, but it's just a bit thicker. Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy M10, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 5 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 5 counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy M10, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a lot higher pixel number per inch of display. Google Pixel 5 has a better camera than Galaxy M10, because although it has a less mega pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures and a larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Google Pixel 5 features slightly more memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M10, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 5 counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy M10, because it has a 20 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.