Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 271 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.36 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 has a global score of 77.7, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy M10's global score of 73.5. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but HTC One M9 has 5.0 version and Galaxy M10 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The HTC One M9 design is a little lighter than Galaxy M10, although it is a lot thicker and was released many years before.
The HTC One M9 has a quite better processing power than Galaxy M10, and although they both have 8 processing cores and a 3 GB RAM, the HTC One M9 also has an extra graphics processing unit and a 64 bits CPU. The HTC One M9 counts with a way better display than Galaxy M10, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better pixel quantity per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1920 x 1080.
HTC One M9 has a superior camera than Galaxy M10, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor shooting much better quality photos, a camera in the back with a much higher resolution and a much higher video quality. Samsung Galaxy M10 features a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have equal 32 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy M10 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy M10 counts with superior battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has a 20 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.