Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-02-05 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 271 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 Fit has an overall score of 77, which is a bit better than the Galaxy M10's score of 73.5. Even though LG G7 Fit and Galaxy M10 were only released 3 months apart, the LG G7 Fit construction is a bit lighter but a bit thicker. These devices include Android OS, but the LG G7 Fit has the older 8.1 Oreo version while Galaxy M10 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
LG G7 Fit features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy M10, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with 1 GB more RAM. The LG G7 Fit counts with an incredibly better display than Galaxy M10, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better pixel number per inch of display and a much better resolution of 1440 x 3120.
The LG G7 Fit has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy M10, and although they both have exactly the same 32 GB internal memory capacity, the LG G7 Fit also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy M10 counts with just a little bit longer battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity.
LG G7 Fit takes clearer videos and photos than Galaxy M10, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking photos or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor, the LG G7 Fit also counts with a higher resolution back-facing camera and a much higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.