Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 271 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V10 is a bit better than the Galaxy M10, with a 78.6 score against 73.5. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the LG V10 has an older 5.1 version while Galaxy M10 has Android 9.0 Pie. Even though the LG V10 is better than the Galaxy M10, we must note that it's also a noticeably older, heavier and thicker phone.
The LG V10 has a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M10, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher 2560 x 1440px resolution and a way better number of pixels per inch in the screen. Samsung Galaxy M10 counts with a bit superior processor than LG V10, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with more cores (but slower).
The LG V10 captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy M10, because it has a back-facing camera with a higher 16 megapixels resolution, a much higher video resolution, a bigger aperture and a bigger back camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photographs. The LG V10 counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy M10, because it has an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy M10 has a bit superior battery life than LG V10, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.