Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-02-05 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is better than the Galaxy M10's overall score of 73.5. The LG V35 ThinQ design is a little thinner and a little lighter than the Galaxy M10, although both were only released with a couple of months difference. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better display than Galaxy M10, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better display pixel density and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M10, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal memory. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a quite better processing power than Galaxy M10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a superior camera than Galaxy M10, because it has a larger back camera sensor providing a better image quality, a bigger camera aperture to take better photography and video in low light situations, a back camera with a better 16 mega pixels resolution and a way higher (4K) video quality.
The Galaxy M10 features just a little bit longer battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.